AmbassadorEagleMaster603
Describe the writing process for the essay you just…
Describe the writing process for the essay you just completed. Consider the questions below to help you reflect upon your experience with this debate essay.
What was your overall approach to this assignment (i.e. work on it all at once; work on it a little at a time; etc.)?
What steps did you take while working on this essay, including brainstorming, drafting, revising, editing, and so forth?
In what environment did you typically write, and how did that impact your experience with working on this essay?
What was troublesome, difficult, or even a failure in this process/essay, and why?
What did you leave out of your essay, and why?
What did you learn about rhetorical concepts through writing this essay?
If you had another week to work on this essay, what would you change?
In what ways can you see the skills you practiced in this unit being of value to you in other classes?
In the discussion that Intelligence Squared was holding on the topic of “Forgive Student Debt,” I decided to analyze Jordan Weissmann’s argument from the perspective of the “Pro” side of the debate. The rhetorical scenario of the conversation includes a background of the current economic and social climate in the United States, a projected audience of millions of people watching the debate, and the goal of convincing the public to eliminate student debt. All of these elements come together to form the rhetorical scenario. Weissmann’s argument is compelling not just because he effectively uses rhetorical appeals but also because he takes an active role in the more fundamental social and cultural discussions surrounding this topic.
For Weissmann’s argument to be persuasive, the audience must hold values and beliefs that prioritize social justice and the need to offer financial aid to people who are struggling with school debt. Weissmann draws attention to this issue by pointing out how the student debt crisis has worsened due to the ongoing epidemic and how it disproportionately affects certain groups. He also examines the long-term economic effects of student debt, making it abundantly clear that this issue is vital not only for the already burdened with debt but also for the country’s future economic prosperity.
Weissmann’s argument also makes a substantial number of rhetorical assertions. In addition to providing facts and economic data, he used ethos to highlight the severity of the issue by mentioning his personal experiences with college debt. Weissmann also employs pathos when he analyzes how a load of student debt affects individual and family life and the state of the economy. Finally, Weissmann uses logos, or logic, to support his claims regarding the necessity of canceling student loans. By establishing a link between student debt relief and economic growth and stability, he persuasively argues that student debt reduction is a crucial and necessary policy.
By utilizing various rhetorical strategies inside his argument, Jordan Weissmann can build a compelling case for why students require debt relief. His persuasive argument demonstrates the power of rhetoric and how it can be used to make convincing arguments during a live dialogue.
In the “Forgive Student Debt” debate that Intelligence Squared was hosting, I decided to examine Jordan Weissmann’s argument from the “Pro” side. The topic of “Forgive Student Debt” was the focus of the concurrent discussion. Millions of people are watching the debate, the conference’s goal is to persuade the general public to abolish student debt, and the current economic and social climate in the United States serves as the rhetorical backdrop. Weissmann effectively employs rhetorical appeals, but he actively participates in the more critical social and cultural discussions around this subject, which adds to the argument’s overall persuasiveness.
The case made by Weissmann must be persuasive to the audience if they share his priorities for social justice and the need to help those struggling with student loan debt. Weissmann emphasizes the importance of this issue by pointing out how the pandemic’s persistence has contributed to the deterioration of the already-existing student debt problem and how it is disproportionately affecting some standard specifics. Additionally, he talks about the long-term effects of student debt on the economy, emphasizing how significant this problem is not only for people already burdened with debt but also for the future of the country’s economy. He contends that the average student has debts of between $25,000 and $35,000.
They also use a lot of rhetorical appeals in Weissmann’s argument, which is something else they do. He used the rhetorical device of ethos in addition to facts and economic figures by referencing his experiences with student debt. He was able to emphasize the importance of the situation more as a result. Weissmann used pathos as a rhetorical strategy when he discusses how student debt may impact a person’s and their family’s lives and the state of the economy. Not the least of what Weissmann does is employ logos, also referred to as reasoning, to express his beliefs regarding the necessity of canceling student debt. He develops a convincing argument for why student debt reduction is a required and essential policy by drawing a connection between student debt relief and economic growth and stability. He makes the case that lowering student loan debt is necessary.
By including several persuasive arguments in his rationale, Jordan Weissmann may present a convincing argument in favor of canceling student loans. His powerful assertion exemplifies the efficacy of rhetoric and displays how it may be utilized within the framework of live conversation to produce successful and convincing ideas.
