DeanLarkMaster755
2. Alphabetize the 10…
2. Alphabetize the 10 citations. Format each according to the style. Under each citation, in your Annotation, discuss the source in complete sentences / paragraph form (no bullets!) in terms of:
a summary or paraphrase of the source
source’s position: pro (supports or affirms your position) or con (goes against or negates your position)?
source’s type: primary, secondary, or tertiary
source’s data: quantitative or qualitative; the latest research or dated
the author’s solution to the problem
Your personal thoughts on the source. Remember OPCVL (4.2)? What’s the source’s value(s)? What’s the source’s limitation(s)?
Author’s Last, First (Year of Publication). Title of Book. Publisher.
Citation: Johnson, Robert (2020). The Ethics of Capital Punishment: A Comprehensive Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Annotation: Johnson’s book provides an in-depth examination of the ethical considerations surrounding capital punishment. As a primary source, Johnson presents a well-researched and comprehensive analysis of the death penalty, exploring its philosophical, moral, and legal dimensions. He argues that capital punishment violates fundamental human rights and fails to achieve its intended purposes, such as deterrence and retribution. Johnson’s expertise in ethical philosophy lends credibility to his arguments, and his work is intended for both scholars and individuals interested in the topic. This source supports the affirmative position by providing a strong ethical foundation for banning the death penalty
Author’s Last, First (Year of Publication). “Title of Article.” Journal Title, Volume(Issue), page numbers.
Citation: Andrews, Lisa (2021). “The Flaws of Capital Punishment: A Critical Examination.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 110(3), 567-589.
Annotation: Andrews’ article critically evaluates the flaws inherent in the capital punishment system. As a secondary source, the author reviews existing research, analyzes court cases, and identifies inconsistencies and biases in the application of the death penalty. The article presents a well-supported argument against capital punishment, highlighting concerns such as racial and socioeconomic disparities, potential wrongful convictions, and the failure of deterrence. Andrews is a respected criminologist with extensive experience in the field, enhancing the credibility of her analysis. This source is valuable in supporting the affirmative stance by exposing the flaws and injustices associated with the death penalty.
Author’s Last, First (Year of Publication). Title of Book. Publisher.
Citation: Smith, James (2019). Understanding Capital Punishment: A Sociological Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Annotation: Smith’s book offers a sociological perspective on capital punishment, serving as a tertiary source. Drawing from existing research and sociological theories, Smith examines the societal factors that contribute to the persistence of the death penalty. He explores the social, cultural, and political contexts in which capital punishment exists, shedding light on public attitudes, legislative trends, and the influence of media. Although not a primary source, Smith’s expertise in sociology provides valuable insights into the broader implications and systemic issues associated with the death penalty. This source adds depth to the affirmative position by highlighting the social dimensions that surround capital punishment.
Author’s Last, First (Year of Publication). Title of Book. Publisher.
Zimring, Franklin (2003). The Contradictions of American Capital Punishment. Oxford University Press.
Annotation: In Zimring’s book he discusses the different perspectives and beliefs on capital punishment. Throughout the book, Zimring talks about the contradicting beliefs throughout American society. The book also addresses the concern that the United States still uses execution as a form of punishment while western cultures do not. The book takes the affirmative side as the author tries to come up with solutions that will end capital punishment.
Author’s Last Name, First Name. “Title of article or chapter.” Book or Journal Title Volume (date): page numbers.
Rankin, Joseph. “Changing Attitudes Toward Capital Punishment”, Social Forces, Volume 58, Issue 1, September (1979): Pages 194-211
Annotation: NORC does a survey in 1972-1976 and finds out that there is a nonlinear relation between public support for capital punishment and crime rates throughout the U.S. The secondary source article addresses the fact that in the 1968 elections crime was a pressing issue therefore the general public was desperate for harsher punishments. This journal article takes the negative side as the article explains the reasons why in the 1970 public was voting for capital punishment.
Author’s Last Name, First Name. “Title of article or chapter.” Book or Journal Title Volume (date): page numbers.
Unnever, James. Cullen, Francis. Jonson, Cheryl. “Race, Racism, and Support for Capital Punishment.” Prisons and Prisoners Volume 37 (2008).
Annotation: In this Journal Article the authors address the fact that a majority of the support for the death penalty is coming from white Americans. Blacks as well as immigrants being more likely to face the punishment then whites are against the death penalty. The article also talked about how different countries are also discriminating when it comes to the death penalty and therefore the punishment is biased and unfair. This article takes the negative side as it goes through the different reasons of why the death penalty is unfair and racist.
