ChiefFlagLark8
What two approaches of introductions were used? Which of the…
What two approaches of introductions were used?
Which of the introductions is more effective? Why?
Does the introduction provide enough information about the topic and direction of the essay?
Is the position the writer is taking clear?
Is the thesis statement complete, clear, and well-composed?
What do you like most about the introduction?
Offer a suggestion to make the introduction stronger.
The Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM) deployment in the United States has resulted in considerable changes in the field of skilled care facilities. The objective was to move the emphasis away from fee-for-service reimbursement and toward patient-driven care, with a focus on personalised treatment plans and cost-effectiveness. However, if we look at the real-world repercussions of PDPM, a worrisome trend has emerged. Despite the negative consequences, the goal and other possible benefits of PDPM are patient-centered care, improved patient quality measures, more competent nursing care, and sufficient. Through exposure, one will have an understanding of the many effects that PDPM has had on patients’ skilled treatment services. Changes in payments, staffing, and treatment minutes all have a significant influence on patients’ capacity to return home or to a degree of independence. CMS must make the required improvements to PDPM in order to increase rehabilitation potential and patient quality in nursing homes.
In the midst of healthcare policy debates, Medicare has opted to migrate to Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM). The fundamental purpose of this transformation is to tailor care to particular patient requirements while also streamlining reimbursement. However, PDPM had a severe and disturbing influence on nursing home patients’ access to expert therapeutic services. stressing the underlining repercussions of PDPM, while concentrating on the impacts on patients treatment services given in nursing homes. By reviewing the financial incentives, staffing challenges, and quality of care concerns that have emerged since the implementation of PDPM on October 1st, 2019, one must be aware of the current issues that require attention from CMS, healthcare professionals, and individuals who advocate for the elderly. CMS must make the required improvements to PDPM in order to increase rehabilitation potential and patient quality in nursing homes.
Both introductions adequately show the concerning issue that PDPM has brought to patients receiving therapy in skilled care institutions. Bringing attention to the reality that, contrary to what Medicare would want, patients are not the primary focus of the new Model. They set the setting for a debate on the reasons for the changes brought about by PDPM and why we, as CMS, healthcare professionals, and aged advocates, should be concerned. However, whereas the first introduction emphasizes the benefits of PDPM, the second introduction emphasizes the detrimental impact that PDPM has on patients receiving expert therapeutic services. The combination of both views might result in a more thorough argument that addresses both the benefits and drawbacks of PDPM.
