Select Page

JusticeFreedomMagpie33
Lexical vs. Post-lexical rules   discuss in a short paragraph…

Lexical vs. Post-lexical rules

 

discuss in a short paragraph (separately for each phenomenon) whether the following processes are best categorized as lexical or post-lexical rules. Justify your answer with several reasons. (NB: You have been provided with links to the full inventory of each language in question because you will need to refer to it in your reasoning.)

 

a. Liquid Devoicing (French): Liquids devoice after voiceless obstruents.

[Full inventory: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_phonology; scroll to “Consonants”] 

 

pleut               [pl?ø]                ‘rains 3.sg.’

prix                 [p??i]                ‘price’

tram                [t??am]             ‘streetcar’

clair                [kl???]              ‘light’

cri                    [k??i]                ‘shout’

fleur                [fl?œ?]              ‘flower’

frais                [f???]                ‘fresh’

slip                  [sl?ip]               ‘trunks’

 

b. Velar Softening (English): Nouns and adjectives that end in/k/ ? [s] when adding a suffix that begins with a high, front vowel. 

[Full inventory: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_phonology; scroll to “Consonants”] 

 

                        electric           [?l?kt??k]        electricity       [?l?kt??s??i]

                        iconic              [a?k?n?k]        iconicity         [a?k?n?s??i]

                        critic               [k????k]           criticism         [k????s?z?m]

 

 

c. Enchaînement (French): Consonants in the coda resyllabify into the onset of V-initial syllables.

[Full inventory: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_phonology; scroll to “Consonants”] 

 

cette chaussette orange         une femme anglaise               avec une cuillère

[s?t.?o.s?.t?.??~?]                     [yn.fa.m?~.gl?z]                       [a.v?.kyn.k?i.j??] 

‘this orange sock’                  ‘an English woman’               ‘with a spoon’

 

 

d. Schwa epenthesis (German): Schwa is inserted between a coronal stop and a coronal obstruent in verbs (The 3rd sg. present morpheme for regular verbs is just [-t]). 

[Full inventory: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_phonology; scroll to “Vowels”]

                                     

arbeit+ t =      arbeit-e-t        [a?ba?t?t]       ‘works 3.sg.’

     red+ t =       red-e-t             [?e:d?t]           ‘talks 3.sg.’

vs. schwimm+ t =      schwimmt         [?v?mt]            ‘swims 3.sg.’

               lach+ t =       lacht                 [laxt]               ‘laughs 3.sg.’