laurazoma87
Identify the important information from the two perspectives you…
Identify the important information from the two perspectives you have just heard from the videos.
(3-page minimum 12 point New Times Ro
The teacher’s viewpoint China, a teacher in a large, full-day child care center shares a dilemma about how to express her concerns about little Aaron, a 4-year-old boy in her class, with his father Aaron. (running time: 2 min. 12 sec.) https://vimeo.com/297461516
The family’s viewpoint : Aaron, the father of little Aaron, a 4-year-old boy in a preschool classroom, shares his story and goals for his family’s future. (running time: 1 min. 37 sec.)
Describe Aaron’s priorities and concerns
Describe China’s priorities and concerns
Using information from the handouts and articles discribe how would work to promote a trusting family-professional partnership while keeping the individual priorities in mind?
Rubric
Rubric For Weekly Homework
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
3 pts
Full Marks
Writing contains insightful and or critical analysis. Discussion of implications for personal and professional functioning.
2 pts
Points
Adequate analysis. Discussion of implications for personal and professional functioning.
1 pts
Points
Partial/Superficial analysis related to required and identified factors.
0 pts
Points
No analysis.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Style
3 pts
Full Marks
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to the question. States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the analysis of evidence/data presented.
2 pts
Points
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to the question. States a conclusion focused solely on the analysis of evidence/data presented. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the analysis of evidence/data presented
1 pts
Points
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities related to the question. States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the analysis of evidence/data presented.
0 pts
No Marks
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or does not articulate its relation to the question. States an ambiguous, illogical, or unsupportable conclusion from analysis of evidence/data presented.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReadings
3 pts
Full Marks
Readings and videos from the module are referenced and discussed in the paper. New readings, websites or videos are referenced in the paper. References are present in proper APA format.
2 pts
points
Readings and videos from the module are referenced and discussed in the paper. References are present in proper APA format.
1 pts
Points
Readings and videos from the module are referenced and discussed in the paper. References are not present in proper APA format.
0 pts
No Marks
References to the readings or videos are not present in the paper.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Mechanics
3 pts
Full Marks
Proficient use of grammar with minimal grammatical errors. Sentences are structured effectively and powerfully, with appropriate sentence style and length. Assignment contains 2 or fewer errors.
2 pts
Points
Writing consistently uses proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Most errors seem to be typos rather than patterns of error. Sentences are varied and appropriately constructed. Contains 3 – 5 errors.
1 pts
Points
Writing could improve with revision. Contains some errors in sentence construction and little variation in sentence structure. Writing includes some errors in usage and syntax, but most do not interfere with readability. Contains 6 to 10 errors.
0 pts
No Marks
Writing is at the level of a first draft, with numerous errors of usage and syntax that interfere with readability and meaning. Contains multiple errors in sentence structure and spelling. Contains over 10 errors.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness
3 pts
Full Marks
The document is posted by the assigned Module.
2 pts
Points
The document is up to 24 hours late
1 pts
Points
The document is up to 48 hours late
0 pts
No Marks
The document os over 48 hours late
3 pts
Total Points: 15 “3-page”
