CommodoreOpossumMaster473
hello tutors, can you help me please , it is so important for me,…
hello tutors, can you help me please , it is so important for me, can you make for me like sample please. also this is my video which is i have to write MACO . because mine is to long and also i want exactly as sample.please help e please it is exam. what do you think is it same, can you help me please
https://youtu.be/kR-a2k7fVBY
sample. Model – Mini Oral Critical Analysis
“Push And Pull Factors Affecting Children in Migration” is a video produced by UNICEF Innocenti in 2016. In the video, five experts discuss the reasons children migrate and what happen to them on the road. According to the experts, children migrate for many complex, multi-faceted reasons. The main reasons include poverty, violence, persecution, family connections in the target place, and hardships caused by climate change.
The relevance of this video is unquestionable, even though it was published five years ago. The video is still relevant because the issue of migrant children is current and pervasive, and a solution does not seem imminent.
This video was produced by UNICEF, which is a reputable organization, and the experts’ credentials are incontestable. The experts hold the following positions: Director of School of Social and Political Sciences of the University of York, Harvard lecturer, Policy Analyst of the Migration Policy Institute, UNICEF Social Policy Specialist, and Independent Consultant on Human Rights & Child Rights in Migration.
The discussion is balanced and does not seem to indicate any biases. Given the experts’ credentials, it is reasonable to assume that the points raised are based on facts and research, even though the experts do not mention any specific sources.
The experts’ claims are clear and well-supported. The evidence is logical, relevant, and sufficient.
All in all, “Push And Pull Factors Affecting Children in Migration” is an excellent source for those interested in the discussion revolving children migration.
my work
The video featured is a discussion between Const. Rob Carver, a Winnipeg Police Service spokesperson, and Colion Noir, who intern, are seen as criminal prevention officers but through social development. Carve in the video, indicates that total burn would not reduce hand gun violence because most of the seized firearms belong to people who are not legally allowed to possess them, which, in short, means tracking the guns will not be as easy as one may think. On the contrary, Colion believes that it is through a handgun ban that related crimes may be reduced. The main discussion is whether gun ban would reduce violence.
When critically analyzing the video, it is important to consider the potential bias and the speakers’ credentials. Carver provides evidence from the special report of the United States Department of Justice. It indicates that over 200 thousand prisoners had guns, and only a handful had a gun license under their names (Noir, 2022). He also uses sources from news outlets such as Sky News that have given statistics on guns on the streets. Colion Noir’s involvement in crime prevention via social development may influence his ideas on tackling gun violence in several ways.
In conclusion, the video gives a balanced discussion on both parties about the handgun ban, with Carver arguing that such a ban may not dominantly combat gun crime. On the other hand, Noir sees social development as a good solution (Noir, 2022). However, the video did not contain solid sources of information, thus making it open for further discussion and investigation.
